Thursday 28 June 2012

OPINION: Facts in Flux


by Chris Luckett

If you were fooled by the picture circulating around yesterday, you weren't alone. Many unsuspecting web surfers were duped into thinking Doc Emmett Brown and Marty McFly travelled to June 27, 2012 in Back to the Future, Part II. Unfortunately, to quote the Clerks animated series, it was just a hoax played by an idiot with too much time on his hands. Here's why:

Image property of Universal Pictures
Back to the Future took place on Oct. 26, 1985. Marty travelled back to Oct. 26, 1955 in the first movie. Because the DeLorean had been programmed to go 30 years into the past for the first trip, Doc Brown set it to travel to Oct. 26, 2015 -- 30 years into the future -- at the end of the first movie. Exhibit A:

MARTY: So, how far ahead are you going?
DOC: About 30 years. It's a nice, round number.

(The reason he said "about" 30 years is simply that, due to leap years, exactly 30 years wouldn't quite be Oct. 26)

Then, Doc Brown returns right before the end of the movie -- the last scene of which is also the first scene in Back to the Future, Part II -- exclaiming that Marty has to come back to the future with him ("You and Jennifer turn out fine; it's your kids, Marty!") Because when Doc Brown had arrived on Oct. 26, 2015, Marty Jr. had been set up by Griff Tannen ("The justice system works swiftly in the future, now that they're abolished all lawyers," Doc tells Marty), Doc brings Marty with him back to the future five days earlier, to Oct. 21, 2015, to prevent Marty, Jr. from agreeing to help Griff, thus preventing Marty, Jr.'s arrest, thus saving the McFly family -- until they then mess up the timeline again and have to fix it again. Exhibit B:

Image property of Universal Pictures
So June 27, 2012 has no relevance at all to the series. Not only did they not travel to 2012, because 27 years is not "a nice, round number," but none of the three movies ever took place in June. (For those curious, Marty travelled to Oct. 26, 1885 in Back to the Future, Part III.)

Two years ago, a photoshopped image of the DeLorean's "destination dashboard" was circulated with the date July 5, 2010, in promotion of the trilogy's release on Blu-Ray that year. (The website TotalFilm eventually 'fessed up to creating that hoax.) Exhibit C:

Image property of TotalFilm
Some prankster/idiot decided to photoshop June 27, 2012 into that same image a few days ago and started circulating it around the Internet, which is the picture you've been seeing. But since Marty and Doc travelled 30 years into the future from 1985, it will still be another three years before we arrive at the same date they went to.

On the plus side, though, that does mean only three more years until Hoverboards.

Monday 18 June 2012

REVIEW: Prometheus

by Chris Luckett

4 1/2 stars out of 5

Image property of 20th Century Fox
Prometheus arrives with outrageous expectations, for a movie whose title doesn’t have a 2 or a 3 at the end. Much has been written in the last year about whether it is or isn’t an Alien prequel, but the real appeal should be this: Ridley Scott has made another science-fiction movie.
            Ridley Scott is a director whose name most people recognize, although many people also probably couldn’t tell you anything he’s directed. Legend, Thelma & Louise, G.I. Jane, Gladiator, Hannibal, Black Hawk Dawn, Kingdom of Heaven, and American Gangster are eight of his most famous. His two arguably most well-known, however, pioneered sci-fi as we know it today: 1979’s Alien and 1982’s Blade Runner.
            After introducing the revolutionary idea that future civilizations and technologies may be run-down and grimy, as opposed to the established thinking of spaceships being gleaming white and cutting-edge, Scott left the genre to focus on others. It’s been thirty years since his last foray past “present day.”
            Those years have not proved a hindrance or handicap for Scott. Prometheus delivers in almost every way one could want it to, even if it ends up biting off more than it can chew.
            Let’s get the other question out of the way right now, though. Is it an Alien prequel? Well, only in the way that Clerks is a prequel to Dogma or that National Lampoon’s Vacation is a prequel to Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. Which is mostly to say: no, it’s not really a prequel.
Prometheus takes place in the year 2093. Alien takes place in 2122. Within the future imagined by Ridley Scott, the events of both movies happen in the same timeline. So, an industrial magnate played by Guy Pearce in Prometheus is name-dropped a few times in Alien. And the planet visited in the opening half of Alien is the same planet that the events in Prometheus take place on. Beyond that, however, there is really no direct correlation between the two movies.
All of which means that if you don’t like Alien, that’s not to say you won’t like Prometheus; nor do you have to have seen any of the Alien movies to appreciate or enjoy Prometheus. It’s a standalone sci-fi thriller that simply happens to share the same potential future as that explored in Alien.
What a sci-fi thriller Prometheus is, though. This, my friends, is the type of movie that deserves witnessing its spectacle on the big screen. I loved The Avengers and The Hunger Games, but I’d be hard-pressed to identify actual shots from those films I remember. There were fantastically gripping scenes, and surely the visual effects and bass explosions were aided by a theatrical environment, but there were no moments that made me stare at the screen in wonder, like used to occur in blockbusters. (As contract, think about the first reveal of a dinosaur in Jurassic Park, or the spaceships first slicing through the clouds in Independence Day, or even the now-cliché “bullet time” in The Matrix).
Image property of 20th Century Fox
Prometheus, on the other       hand, seems ready-made to remind audiences of what spectacle and grandeur in science-fiction used to be. It’s now been a week and a half since I first saw it, and I still vividly recall and can picture over a dozen of the individual sights and “wow” moments in it. There’s no question this is the best-shot and most visually composed blockbuster since 2010’s Inception.
The story concerns one of the oldest questions of humanity: Why are we here? Two scientists, played by Noomi Rapace (star of the original Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) and Logan Marshall-Green (Devil), find millennia-old cave drawings, etchings, and carvings that all feature the same image of a stick figure reaching toward celestial bodies. When it’s determined that the star-pattern matches an actual cluster of stars – with a planet and moon within sight of it – an expedition is sent into space to find answers. The scientists and an accompanying crew (including Charlize Theron, Idris Elba, and Michael Fassbender in an astounding performance) fly to the planet with the hopes of literally meeting their makers.
Of course, if you’ve seen a single commercial or trailer for Prometheus, you know all sorts of hell breaks loose once they get there. Spelling out how or why would detract from the enjoyment of a movie perfectly skilled at spinning its yarn at just the right speed and with just the right flair.
One thing does bear mentioning, though: this is an intense movie. While its R-rating is certainly indicative that the movie’s for adults, it relies much less on gore than people may expect and much more on nail-biting tension. One scene involving Rapace’s scientist character and an emergency operation had me gripping the armrest so hard I actually pulled a muscle. So be forewarned; while Prometheus is not really a scary movie, that’s not to say it’s without extreme moments of tension.
Image property of 20th Century Fox
Prometheus’s only real problem is that it tries to do too much. With all the technology, characters, architecture, life forms, geology, and physics created specifically for this movie, there almost isn’t enough room for it to be asking so many big questions in the already-grand plot, let alone ones that pry at our very existence.
By the final third of the movie, so much is going on, with so many developments occurring left and right, it almost becomes too much for the movie. There are just too many minor characters, subplots, and veering forks in storytelling to form a cohesive narrative from start to finish, which would have served this movie better. You almost get the sense Scott was so excited to be playing in this sandbox that he couldn’t focus on just one toy to play with.
Still, complaining about a sci-fi movie being too rich with potential and ideas, when so many barely have enough to get by, is like griping about a comedy having too many jokes. Prometheus is the kind of theatrical experience that only comes around once or twice a year. If you have the nerve resolve and you don’t mind lofty questions interspersed with your action, you owe it to yourself to see Prometheus this summer. And on as big a screen as possible.