By Chris Luckett
4 stars out of 5
J.J. Abrams’s 2009 Star Trek was an exhilarating breath of fresh air for a franchise
that had become stale and somewhat antiquated, despite its futuristic setting.
By injecting his trademark cinematic flair and knack for gripping action, the
reboot soared to heights not reached on the big screen since 1982’s Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Low
expectations four years ago made Abrams’s job easier; his follow-up arrives
with much larger hype and much closer scrutiny.
 |
| Image property of Paramount Pictures |
Star
Trek Into Darkness is reflective of a new trend in
recent blockbusters, where over-the-top action sequences are balanced with grey
morality and disturbing characters whose actions and choices mirror the
dangerous time we now live in (largely due, cinematically, to the influence of
Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight
trilogy). Just as James Bond had to tackle new threats of terrorism and treasonous
sabotage in last year’s Skyfall,
James T. Kirk and crew find themselves faced with a formidable threat aiming to
destroy Starfleet from within.
 |
| Image property of Paramount Pictures |
That threat is John Harrison, a man with a
mysterious backstory and played with complicated malevolence by Benedict Cumberbatch.
After Harrison attacks Starfleet bases in London and San Francisco, Kirk (Chris
Pine) and Spock (Zachary Quinto) trek off in a mission of vengeance, setting in
motion a story with more layers than an onion.
Abrams and his co-writers deftly lure you
into thinking you know what will happen, even telegraphing a few twists, just
to be able to pull the rug out from beneath you even more shockingly. Star Trek Into Darkness is one of those
incredibly clever movies where the more sure you are about what will happen,
the more likely you are to fall for the red herrings.
 |
| Image property of Paramount Pictures |
The action sequences in the movie are
riveting, leaving just enough time in between to allow for conversation and
character development. As great as many of the scenes are, though, the film
can’t help but come off a little reheated. 2009’s Star Trek felt fresh and bold; Star
Trek Into Darkness, while superior in numerous ways, sometimes feels like a
remix of its predecessors.
It’s a pointless quibble to complain that Star Trek Into Darkness’s themes of
violence and terrorism are a far cry from the optimistic and hopeful vision of
the future that creator Gene Roddenberry first imagined a half-century ago. In
the end, while the movie certainly explores its titular dark themes, it is an
exhilarating thrill ride that starts strong and never slows down. It’s just a
shame that for a series that aims to boldly go where no one has gone before, Star Trek Into Darkness doesn’t end up
doing much new.
UPDATE: After a second viewing and re-considering its weaknesses, I lowered my star rating of Star Trek Into Darkness from 4.5 stars to 4. It is still a very good movie, but not as great as it initially seemed to be. (9/7/13)
UPDATE: After a second viewing and re-considering its weaknesses, I lowered my star rating of Star Trek Into Darkness from 4.5 stars to 4. It is still a very good movie, but not as great as it initially seemed to be. (9/7/13)
